Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Smith et al v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2020cv00887
Plaintiff:
Suzanne E. Smith and Todd Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Standard Oil Company Inc et al
as 2:2019cv04605
Defendant:
Standard Oil Company, Inc. d/b/a Standard Oil Company Of West Virginia, Inc., Mary Zingale, Robert German and others
Plaintiff:
James E Smith and James E Smith, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03205
Plaintiff:
Kevin E. Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. HPR Clinic, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00464
Defendant:
Harry Nguyen, M.D., HPR Clinic, LLC and Ryan Fryman, M.D.
Plaintiff:
Betty E Smith and Betty E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00429
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
William E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barrow v. Holton et al
as 1:2018cv00430
Plaintiff:
Richard Barrow
Defendant:
Toby Holton, Tony Barrett, Kolesar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrow v. Holton et al
as 2:2018cv00674
Plaintiff:
Richard Barrow
Defendant:
Toby Holton, Tony Barrett, Kolesar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Anderson et al
as 2:2017cv00800
Plaintiff:
William E. Smith
Defendant:
Brigham Anderson, Jeff Lawless, Lawrence County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Warden, Correction Reception Center
as 2:2017cv00577
Petitioner:
William E. Smith
Respondent:
Warden, Correction Reception Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ibanez v. Ogunbiyi et al
as 2:2016cv01131
Plaintiff:
Regina M. Ibanez
Defendant:
Bayo Ogunbiyi, Will Williams, Ms. Roxy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
