Cases filed in Ohio
Cases 21 - 30 of 61
Smith v. Warden, Correction Reception Center We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00577
Petitioner: William E. Smith
Respondent: Warden, Correction Reception Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ibanez v. Ogunbiyi et al
as 2:2016cv01131
Plaintiff: Regina M. Ibanez
Defendant: Bayo Ogunbiyi, Will Williams, Ms. Roxy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02278
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Smith v. Northland Group, Inc.
as 1:2016cv02192
Plaintiff: Dominicque E. Smith
Defendant: Northland Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. Smith et al
as 2:2016cv00646
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Ronald E Smith, Deborah L Smith, Joyce A Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Tum-Re El v. Van Saun et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv02708
Plaintiff: Montu Hotep Tum-Re El
Defendant: Bruce Van Saun, Brian E. Smith and Matthew Keel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. USA
as 1:2015cv02662
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Andre E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tum-Re El v. Van Saun et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv01248
Plaintiff: Montu Hotep Tum-Re El
Defendant: Bruce Van Saun , Brian E. Smith and Matthew Keel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Mohr et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv01264
Plaintiff: William E. Smith
Defendant: Gary Mohr, Timothy Buchannon, Charolette Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01169
Plaintiff: Robert E Smith
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?