Cases 1 - 10 of 11
OptumRX Inc. v. Maurice E Sullivan
as 8:2022cv00633
Petitioner:
OptumRX Inc.
Respondent:
Maurice E Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
Sullivan v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2022cv01269
Plaintiff:
Maria E. Sullivan
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hadden v. Kernan et al
as 3:2016cv02686
Plaintiff:
Michael Kenneth Hadden
Defendant:
Steve Kernan, W.L. Muniz, R.T.C. Grounds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hadden v. Kernan et al
as 1:2016cv00639
Plaintiff:
Michael Kenneth Hadden
Defendant:
Steve Kernan, W.L. Muniz, R.T.C. Grounds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2015cv01854
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Steven E. Sullivan, Bruce A. Quattrone and Christina M. Quattrone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ignacio Moreno v. Jeffrey Katzenberg et al
as 2:2014cv06914
Plaintiff:
Ignacio Moreno
Defendant:
Richard E. Sullivan, Harry M. Brittenham, Thomas E. Freston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brian Roffe 401K Plan 002 UAD 01/01/12 v. Dreamworks Animation SKG, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv06201
Plaintiff:
Brian Roffe 401K Plan 002 UAD 1/01/2012
Defendant:
Lewis W. Coleman, Dreamworks Animation SKG, Inc., Jeffrey Katzenberg and others
Sullivan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2013cv01460
Plaintiff:
Leon E. Sullivan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Bowen et al v. Sullivan et al
as 4:2011cv06285
Defendant:
Daniel J. Bowen, E. Sullivan, E. Golden and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lemus v. Sullivan et al
as 4:2011cv01099
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Lemus
Defendant:
E. Sullivan, J. Lee, A. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
