Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Hash v. Petrovic et al
as 5:2022cv05255
Plaintiff:
Lawrence George Hash
Defendant:
D. Petrovic, M. Giacomazzi, D. Dorsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamisi Calloway v. Ronald Davis, et al
as 21-16638
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY
Defendant / Appellee:
RONALD DAVIS, Warden, A. W. DEEMS, E. TOOTELL and others
Bratton v. Broomfield et al
as 5:2020cv03885
Defendant:
Dr. Sandler, C. Young, A. Maxfield and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald W. Bratton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hash v. Giacomazzi et al
as 5:2020cv01116
Defendant:
S. Lucas, C. Remillard, R. Persaud and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence George Hash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James McCurdy v. B. Deal, et al
as 19-17108
Defendant:
MICHAEL FELDER, BICK, M.D., J. CLARK KELSON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
B. DEAL, M.D.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES CLAYTON MCCURDY
Calloway v. Davis et al
as 4:2019cv06758
Defendant:
A.W. Deems, E. Tootell, San Joaquin General Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Jamisi Jermaine Calloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Sabino Quair II v. Calif. Corr. Health Care Services et al
as 5:2019cv01651
Defendant:
S. Lesher, T. Le, E. Tootell and others
Plaintiff:
David Sabino Quair III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Truman v. Alvior et al
as 4:2018cv05529
Plaintiff:
Charles Truman
Defendant:
E. Tootell, M. Alvior, A. Devers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodges v. Davis et al
as 5:2018cv04658
Defendant:
Sergeant M. Bloise, Ron Davis, E. Tootell and others
Plaintiff:
Odell D. Hodges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jumah Moore-Ali v. J. Lewis, et al
as 18-15411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUMAH THOMAS MOORE-ALI, AKA Jumah Moore Ali, AKA Jumah Thomas Moore Ali
Defendant - Appellee:
J. LEWIS, Director of Califrnia Correctional Health Care Services, CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES, E. TOOTELL, Chief Medical Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.