Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Earl Cooper v. L. Doyle, et al
as 17-40998
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL DANIEL COOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
L. DOYLE, Warden, SAMUEL A. OJO, Correctional Officer, SHAYLA B. HEBERT, Correctional Officer and others
Earl Cooper v. L. Doyle, et al
as 17-40759
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL DANIEL COOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
L. DOYLE, Warden, SAMUEL A. OJO, Correctional Officer, SHAYLA B. HEBERT, Correctional Officer and others
Cooper, Jr. v. Stephens et al
as 9:2015cv00176
Plaintiff:
Earl Daniel Cooper, Jr.
Defendant:
William Stephens, Todd Harris, Shirley Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Doyle et al
as 3:2015cv00253
Plaintiff:
Earl Daniel Cooper
Defendant:
L Doyle, Samuel A Ojo, Shayla B Hebert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earl Cooper v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 12-10799
Petitioner - Appellant:
EARL DANIEL COOPER
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Cooper v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2012cv00145
Petitioner:
Earl Daniel Cooper
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cooper v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2012cv00346
Petitioner:
Earl Daniel Cooper
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Earl Cooper v. Rick Thaler, Director, et al
as 12-10182
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL DANIEL COOPER, also known as Earl D. Cooper, also known as Earl Cooper, Jr., also known as Earl Daniel Cooper, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK THALER, Director, CHARLES R. MCDUFFIE, Warden, NORVEL L. ARNOLD, Assistant Warden and others
Cooper v. Lopez et al
as 2:2011cv00233
Plaintiff:
Earl Daniel Cooper
Defendant:
Abe Lopez, Randall Sims, Steve Denny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Thaler et al
as 2:2011cv00161
Plaintiff:
Earl Daniel Cooper
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Charles R McDuffie, Norvel L Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
