Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Crago #115357 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00942
Plaintiff: Earl Felton Crago, Jr.
Defendant: Ryan Thornell and Derric Keaton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crago v. Shinn, et al.
as 24-603
Petitioner / Appellant: EARL FELTON CRAGO, JR.
Respondent / Appellee: DAVID SHINN, DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, AND REENTRY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Crago v. Mattos
as 23-268
Petitioner: EARL FELTON CRAGO, JR.
Respondent: JOHN MATTOS, WARDEN
Crago #115357 v. Shinn et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00339
Petitioner: Earl Felton Crago, Jr.
Respondent: David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crago #115357 v. Pitz We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv04532
Plaintiff: Earl Felton Crago, Jr.
Defendant: Joseph Pitz, Berry Larson and Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earl Crago, Jr. v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 17-16469
Petitioner - Appellant: EARL FELTON CRAGO, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee: CHARLES L. RYAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Crago v. Ryan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv02007
Petitioner: Earl Felton Crago, Jr.
Respondent: Charles Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Earl Crago, Jr. v. Richard Bock
as 13-73476
Petitioner: EARL FELTON CRAGO, Jr.
Respondent: RICHARD A. BOCK
Crago v. Ryan et al
as 4:2012cv00176
Petitioner: Earl Felton Crago, Jr.
Respondent: Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crago v. Clark et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv02368
Plaintiff: Earl Felton Crago, Jr.
Defendant: Unknown Clark and Unknown Portillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?