Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Earnest v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Gregory Earnest
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Attorney General, Phoenix Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin #106355 v. Adams et al
as 2:2023cv00657
Plaintiff:
Earnest Austin, Jr.
Defendant:
Karanja Adams, Rodney Stewart, Ryan Thornell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Osborn v. Gawlik et al
as 2:2022cv02179
Plaintiff:
Michael R Osborn
Defendant:
Michael Gawlik, Keith Olson, Erick Akers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Glover v. Good2go Publishing
as 2:2022cv01064
Plaintiff:
Earnest Lee Glover
Defendant:
Good2go Publishing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Earnest #056363 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2019cv05690
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Phoenix Police Department, Tony Colon and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Earnest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03698
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Earnest Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Earnest v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2019cv02213
Defendant:
Gus Kostas, Arizona, State of, Clint Hiener and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lewis Earnest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earnest #56363 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2018cv04226
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Phoenix Police Department, Arizona Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lewis Earnest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv03994
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Earnest L Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Earnest v. Jorin et al
as 4:2018cv00476
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lewis Earnest
Defendant:
Daniela Romo, Unknown Reyes and Unknown Jorin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
