Cases 11 - 20 of 232
Brown v. Rivers
as 3:2018cv00724
Plaintiff:
Earnest Lee Brown
Defendant:
Warden Rivers
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
United States of America Upon the Relation and For the Use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-of-Way over 0.24 Acre of Land, more or less, in Tallahatchie County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2018cv00169
Defendant:
Unknown Heirs of Clyde Lee Moore, Lashawn Towns, Unknown Heirs of Candis M. Patton and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America Upon the Relation and For the Use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Respondent:
Ora Johnson, Jerlean Hawkins and Beulah Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Herring v. Smith
as 3:2018cv00454
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Warden Brandon Smith
Plaintiff:
Earnest Herring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. Lee et al
as 4:2018cv00151
Plaintiff:
Tracy Harris
Defendant:
Earnest Lee, Johnson, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Banks et al
as 5:2018cv00061
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Brooks
Defendant:
Jacqueline Banks, Earnest Lee, Gabiral Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herring v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2018cv00268
Petitioner:
Earnest Herring
Defendant:
Brandon Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carroll v. Rogers et al
as 4:2018cv00094
Plaintiff:
Michael Dean Carroll
Defendant:
"Unknown" Rogers, Unknown Muffett, Unknown Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopkins et al v. Hosemann
as 3:2018cv00188
Plaintiff:
Dennis Hopkins , Herman Parker, Jr. , Walter Wayne Kuhn, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Delbert Hosemann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Lee et al
as 4:2017cv00144
Plaintiff:
Michael Dean Carroll
Defendant:
Earnest Lee, Timothy Morris, Moffett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
