Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Linda Hammell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 15-2643
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDA HAMMELL, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Arthur Hammell
Defendant - Appellee:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP, as successor by merger to Buffalo Pump, Inc., ARVINMERITOR INC, FKA Arvin Industries Inc, individually and as successor by merger to Rockwell International, BORG WARNER MORSE TEC, FKA Borg Warner Inc and others
Linda Hammell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 15-2643
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINDA HAMMELL, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Arthur Hammell
Defendant:
CARRIER CORP, TODD SHIPYARDS, individually and for its Todd Combustion Division formerly known as American Standard, Inc., successor-ininterest to Kewanee Boiler Corp., EATON CORP, as successor-in-interest to Cutler-Hammer, Inc. agent ofn/k/a Eaton Electrical, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CBS CORP, a Delaware Corporation, f/k/a Viacom, Inc., individually and as successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation, CRANE CO, successor to Jenkins Valves, Inc. also known as Jenkins Bros., FOSTER WHEELER CORP and others
Olschewske et al v. Asbestos Defendants
as 3:2010cv01729
Defendant:
Standco, Inc., General Motors Corporation, Allis-Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Linda Olschewske, Ellamae Pike and Thomas R. Olschewske
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Olschewske et al v. Asbestos Defendants
as 4:2010cv01729
Plaintiff:
Linda Olschewske , Thomas R. Olschewske and Ellamae Pike
Defendant:
Asbestos Defendants , Rockwell Automation, Inc. , A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Lydick v. Eaton Electrical Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv11774
Plaintiff:
Herbert Lydick
Defendant:
Eaton Electrical Inc. and Swissport Fueling, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
