Cases 1 - 10 of 286
Blalock v. Corley et al
as 3:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
Karel Blalock
Defendant:
Lt. Corley, Lt. K.L. Strong, Captain A. Eberling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnett Customs, LLC v. Bankers Insurance Company et al
as 6:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Burnett Customs, LLC
Defendant:
Bankers Insurance Company, Eberl Claim Services and Transcynd Claim Partners
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Saddleback Exploration, LLC v. Brunelle et al
as 4:2023cv03091
Plaintiff:
Saddleback Exploration, LLC
Defendant:
Barbara Brunelle, Allen P. Wherry Revocable Trust, Betty Coole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01790
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stacia Cullors, et al v. Cerebral, Inc.
as 23-55594
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STACIA CULLORS, an individual, ERIC EBERLE, an individual, NICOLE SCURLOCK DEWEY, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CEREBRAL, INC.
Musier v. MHM, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01047
Plaintiff:
Tyree Musier
Defendant:
MHM, Inc., Dr. Cousins, J. Rivello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EBERLE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13668
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN EBERLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
EBERLE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12334
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA EBERLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Taylor v. Harry et al
as 1:2023cv00882
Plaintiff:
Eric L. Taylor
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, John Rivello, C.O. II Wendle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KINARD v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09991
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KINARD, LAYWOOD MOLETTE, JONATHAN OVERFELT and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
