Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 31
BURLINGTON DRUG CO., INC. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv02389
Plaintiff: A.F.L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND, AMERICAN SALES COMPANY INC. and others
Defendant: CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS SERVICE, CVS Caremark Corporation, DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Petitioner: MATRIX LABORATORIES LIMITED, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and MATRIX LABORATORIES INC.
Special Master: JOSE L. LINARES
In Re: LIPITOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court: FAITH HOCHBERG
Intervenor: MYLAN INC.
Interested Party: CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC. v. WYETH, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv05479
Defendant: WYETH LLC, WYETH, INC., WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Not Yet Classified: HEB GROCERY COMPANY LP, RITE AID CORPORATION, PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND and others
Not Classified By Court: FAITH HOCHBERG
In Re: EFFEXOR XR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Special Master: JONATHAN J. LERNER
Interested Party: IBEW -- NECA Local 505 Health & Welfare Plan, MC -- UA Local 119 Health & Welfare Plan, CADILA HEALTHCARE LIMITED and others
Plaintiff: Individual Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs and PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC.
Petitioner: TIMMY P. THIEN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA v. CVS RX SERVICES, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv04701
Plaintiff: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant: CVS RX SERVICES, INC., CVS PHARMACY, INC., PENNSYLVANIA CVS PHARMACY L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MIDDLETOWN TOWNSHIP v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC et al
as 2:2021cv00629
Defendant: MCKESSON CORPORATION, ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC. F/K/A WATSON PHARMA, INC., ANDA, INC. and others
Plaintiff: MIDDLETOWN TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOWER MAKEFIELD TOWNSHIP v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 2:2020cv03695
Defendant: MCKESSON CORPORATION, RICHARD S. SACKLER, ANDA, INC. and others
Plaintiff: LOWER MAKEFIELD TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TOWNSHIP OF BARNEGAT v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. et al
as 3:2019cv18442
Defendant: ASSOCIATED PHARMACIES, INC., MCKESSON CORPORATION, ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Plaintiff: BARNEGAT TOWNSHIP and TOWNSHIP OF BARNEGAT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Walgreen Co. et al v. Wyeth, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv08965
Plaintiff: Meijer Distribution Inc., PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Defendant: WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS INC, WYETH, INC., WYETH LLC and others
3Rd Party Defendant: APOTEX CORP.
In Re: Effexor XR Antitrust Litigation
Interested Party: A.F. of L. -- AGC Building Trades Welfare Plan
KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC vs. CEPHALON, INC., ET AL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2006cv01797
Plaintiff: AMERICAN SALES CO., INC., BURLINGTON DRUG COMPANY, INC., CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION and others
Defendant: BARR LABORATORIES, INC., BARR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., CEPHALON, INC. and others
Petitioner: TADEKA PHARMACEUTICAL NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
RITE AID CORPORATION et al v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2015cv01950
Plaintiff: RITE AID CORPORATION , RITE AID HDQTRS. CORP. , JCG (PJC) USA, LLC and others
Defendant: ABBOTT LABORATORIES , ABBVIE INC. , TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
ECKERD CORPORATION v. RHOADS AVENUE NEWTOWN SQUARE, LP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv04752
Plaintiff: ECKERD CORPORATION
Defendant: RHOADS AVENUE NEWTOWN SQUARE, LP, JANET A. KIRK, TIMOTHY BARNARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?