Cases 1 - 10 of 137
(PS) Portnoy et al v. DeMore et al
as 2:2023cv02485
Plaintiff:
Elena Portnoy and Sergei Portnoy - VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Charles H DeMore, Eduardo Aguirre, John Ashcroft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv09876
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv05404
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02707
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv00204
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ebrahim F. Mebarkeh v. Eric Holder et al
as 2:2009cv06807
Plaintiff:
Ebrahim F. Mebarkeh
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano, Eduardo Aguirre and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv06628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Juan Reyes-Escobar v. Alberto Gonzales, et al
as 08-56601
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUAN AUGUSTO REYES-ESCOBAR
Defendant - Appellee:
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and others
Seong Hee Lee v. The United States of America et al
as 2:2008cv04977
Plaintiff:
Seong Hee Lee
Defendant:
The United States of America, Michael B. Mukasey, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Na Hyun Lee v. The United States of America et al
as 2:2008cv04976
Plaintiff:
Na Hyun Lee
Defendant:
The United States of America, Michael B. Mukasey, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
