Cases 1 - 10 of 648
McMahon v. The State of Nevada
as 3:2024cv00292
Petitioner:
Johnny Edward McMahon
Respondent:
The State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knight v. USA
as 3:2024cv00360
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Edward Monet Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Scott v. Green
as 3:2024cv00347
Defendant:
Cynthia Green
Plaintiff:
James Edward Scott, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Dr. Jason Eric Garber et al
as 2:2024cv01141
Defendant:
Nevada Board of Examiners, Edward O Cousineau, Dr. Adam Antflick and others
Plaintiff:
Cheri Nicole Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00977
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
White Rocks (BVI) Holdings Inc. et al v. Reichman et al
as 2:2024cv01222
Defendant:
David Reichman, Donald Gilbert, Kathy M Griffin and others
Plaintiff:
John Fee, Andy Beymer, White Rocks (BVI) Holdings Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Property Damage (P.I
Reed v. Rivas et al
as 2:2024cv01161
Defendant:
Symour Omandac and Rivas
Plaintiff:
Demario Edward Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dillard v. Lovell et al
as 2:2024cv01143
Plaintiff:
James H Dillard, II
Defendant:
Damon Lovell, Kenneth 4 Rucker, Marquis Platt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ekes v. Geico
as 2:2024cv00919
Defendant:
Geico General Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Edward L Ekes and Patricia V Ekes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Kim et al
as 2:2024cv00830
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Edward Y Kim and Victoria Leavitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
