Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00996
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
PAYNE v. METROPOLITAN BALA APARTMENTS et al
as 2:2023cv05054
Plaintiff:
EDWARD HAYWOOD PAYNE, JR.
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN BALA APARTMENTS and METROPOLITAN MANAGEMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7401 Clean Air Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
PAYNE v. MANSION AT BALA
as 2:2023cv03408
Plaintiff:
DENIYA NAKEIDRA SMITH and EDWARD HAYWOOD PAYNE, JR.
Defendant:
GRACIELA CHRISTLIEB, ANITA J MURRY and MANSION AT BALA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Edward Payne, Jr. v. Prevention Point Philadelphia, et al
as 21-2173
Defendant / Appellee:
PREVENTION POINT and PREVENTION POINT PHILADELPHIA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD HAYWOOD PAYNE, JR.
Edward Payne, Jr. v. Prevention Point Philadelphia, et al
as 21-1312
Defendant / Appellee:
PREVENTION POINT and PREVENTION POINT PHILADELPHIA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD HAYWOOD PAYNE, JR.
PAYNE v. PREVENTION POINT PHILADELPHIA, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv04444
Plaintiff:
EDWARD HAYWOOD PAYNE, JR.
Defendant:
PREVENTION POINT PHILADELPHIA, INC. and PREVENTION POINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAYNE v. UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, (I.R.S.)
as 2:2018cv03970
Defendant:
UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, (I.R.S.)
Plaintiff:
EDWARD HAYWOOD PAYNE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
