Cases 21 - 30 of 33
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv34560
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv30345
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH EDWARD THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv00993
Petitioner:
Edward Thomas James
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018mc00036
Petitioner:
Edward Thomas James
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bayberry Lakes Homeowners Association, Inc. et al v. Boeneman et al
as 6:2018cv00072
Plaintiff:
Bayberry Lakes Homeowners Association, Inc. , Dawn Adams , Luis Albelo and others
Defendant:
Gerald Boeneman , George Glance, III , Michael Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thomas v. Espisito
as 3:2017cv00108
Plaintiff:
William Edward Thomas, IV
Defendant:
Espisito
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. United States of America
as 8:2016cv01787
Plaintiff:
Edward Thomas
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Thomas v. Secretary, DOC et al
as 2:2014cv00652
Petitioner:
Donald Edward Thomas
Respondent:
Secretary, DOC, State of Florida and Harry L. Shorstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Warden, FCC Coleman Medium
as 5:2013cv00391
Petitioner:
Edward Thomas
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
