Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Barbieri v. EEOC
as 2:2022cv01701
Plaintiff: Anthony Ruben Aldo Barbieri
Defendant: EEOC
Marilu Touma v. EEOC, et al
as 20-56126
Defendant / Appellee: DOES, 1 through 10, Inclusive, EEOC EMPLOYEE, 1, 2, 3, PARADOM, Unknown officer name and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARILU F. TOUMA
Craig Ross, et al v. P. White, et al
as 20-55236
Defendant / Appellee: BARRY PASTERNACK, MONIQUE SHAY, FRAMROZE M. VIRJEE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CRAIG ROSS and NATALIE OPERSTEIN
Craig Ross, et al v. P. White, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-55900
Defendant / Appellee: BARRY PASTERNACK, MONIQUE SHAY, FRAMROZE M. VIRJEE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CRAIG ROSS and NATALIE OPERSTEIN
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-16037
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stacey Ann Foster v. EEOC-Los Angeles et al
as 2:2017cv07519
Defendant: EEOC-Los Angeles and EEOC-San Antonio
Plaintiff: Stacey Ann Foster
Barnes v. EEOC
as 2:2016cv00558
Plaintiff: Business Darene Barnes
Defendant: EEOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Kelton Williams v. Phyllis Cheng, et al
as 14-55153
Plaintiff / Appellant: KELTON WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee: PHYLLIS W. CHENG, DFEH Director, OLOPHIUS PERRY, EEOC Director, LOTTIE WOODRUFF, DFEH Employee and others
Chapman v. San Francisco Newpaper Agency, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2007cv04775
Plaintiff: Gregory Grant Chapman, Sr.
Defendant: San Francisco Newspaper Agency and US EEOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Buesgens et al v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 3:2009mc80109
Plaintiff: Michael L. Buesgens, Arlene M. Martinez and Nancy Walraven
Defendant: Internal Revenue Service, Department of the Treasury, Federal Occupational Health Service (FOHS) and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?