Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Landis v. Elkhart County Correctional Complex
as 3:2026cv00871
Plaintiff:
Theodore Landis
Defendant:
Elkhart County Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodwin v. Elkhart County et al
as 3:2026cv00431
Plaintiff:
Mark A Goodwin and Mark Anthony Goodwin
Defendant:
Elkhart County, Clevenger, Barb Fitzgeral and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodwin v. Elkhart County et al
as 3:2026cv00275
Plaintiff:
Mark A Goodwin and Mark Anthony Goodwin
Defendant:
Elkhart County, Dan Milanese, Karl Miller and others
Unknown:
BRANCHVILLE E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Blacharski v. Laureys et al
as 3:2025cv01099
Plaintiff:
Brandyn Blacharski and Brandyn Michael Blacharski
Defendant:
Rodney G Laureys, Frank Schaffer, Damon Leichty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tervarus Gary v. Elkhart County Sheriff's Department, et al
as 25-3161
Plaintiff:
TERVARUS L. GARY
Defendant:
ELKHART COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, JEFF SEGAL and OFFICER KHAN
Peepers v. Elkhart County Jail
as 3:2025cv00610
Plaintiff:
Steven A Peepers
Defendant:
Elkhart County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peepers v. Elkhart County Jail
as 3:2025cv00571
Defendant:
Elkhart County Jail and Elkhart County Corrections Center
Plaintiff:
Steven A Peepers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easton v. Elkhart County Jail
as 2:2025cv00293
Plaintiff:
Darious Eugene Easton
Defendant:
Elkhart County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dallas Blankenship, III v. Elkhart County Sheriff
as 25-1663
Plaintiff:
DALLAS RAY BLANKENSHIP, III
Defendant:
ELKHART COUNTY SHERIFF, sued in his official capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
