Cases 1 - 10 of 19
NISBET v. ELLIS et al
as 1:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA R NISBET and JOSHUA LIBBY
Defendant:
ROB ELLIS, STEVE WEBSTER, CHRIS TODD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W JOHNSON
Defendant:
DONALD J TRUMP, FACEBOOK, META and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HART v. STATE OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAMES HART
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, AUBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT, NICHOLAS GAGNON and others
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC v. ELLIS et al
as 1:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC
Defendant:
CASEY J ELLIS and STATE OF MAINE, MAINE REVENUE SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. ELLIS
as 2:2021cv00129
Defendant:
SUSAN WEAVER ELLIS
Plaintiff:
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ELLIS v. SHIRIKAWA
as 1:2021cv00030
Defendant:
HAILEY K SHIRIKAWA and HAILEY DIMOND
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL P ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRAYMAN v. PORTER et al
as 1:2020cv00169
Defendant:
CAPTAIN SEAN MAGUIRE, CAPTAIN GARY CRAFTS, MAJOR RAYMOND PORTER and others
Plaintiff:
WADE DREW BRAYMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION v. ELLIS et al
as 1:2019cv00320
Defendant:
PAMELA L ELLIS and WILLARD W ELLIS, JR
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION v. ELLIS et al
as 1:2019cv00060
Defendant:
NAN ELLIS, GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION, TIMOTHY D ELLIS and others
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ELLIS
as 1:2016mc00015
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
JAYE ELLIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
