Cases 21 - 30 of 222
United States of America v. Ellis
as 3:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carlus Ellis
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America v. Ellis
as 3:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Latifah Ellis
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Liggins v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Marichea Liggins
Defendant:
United States of America and William M. Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
United States of America v. Ellis
as 3:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Totianna Ellis
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America v. Ellis
as 3:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jessica Ellis
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Edwards v. Ellis Law Firm, PLLC et al
as 1:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Lisa Edwards
Defendant:
Ellis Law Firm, PLLC and Diane Herman Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Pickens v. City of Laurel et al
as 2:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Deontae Pickens
Defendant:
City of Laurel, City of Laurel Police Department, Tommy Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ellis v. Huffman
as 3:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Thomas Earl Ellis
Defendant:
Brand Huffman
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ellis v. Huffman
as 3:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Thomas Earl Ellis
Defendant:
Brand Huffman
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
