Cases 11 - 20 of 60
Ovalle v. Homeland Security, et al
as 08-30352
Petitioner - Appellant:
HECTOR OVALLE
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, MICHAEL B MUKASEY, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL and EMILIO GONZALEZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00075
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Alasad v. Barrows et al
as 3:2008cv00161
Plaintiff:
Ayman Alasad
Defendant:
Anne K Barrows, Emilio Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Othman v. Chertoff, et al
as 08-20034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEDAL OTHMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, EMILIO GONZALEZ, SHARON HUDSON and others
Fayyaz et al v. Chertoff et al
as 4:2008cv00210
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Fayyaz, Mohammad Fayyaz, Mohammad Fayyaz and others
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzalez, Sharon Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Razaqyar v. Barrows et al
as 3:2008cv00020
Plaintiff:
Muslima Sonia Razaqyar
Defendant:
Anne K Barrows, Emilio Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Tse v. Mukasey et al
as 3:2007cv02133
Plaintiff:
Wai Kin Tse
Defendant:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Angela Barrows and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Khan v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2007mc00698
Plaintiff:
Sher Azam Khan
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security, Emilio Gonzalez, Sharon Hudson and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
