Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Emmanuel Edokobi v. SunTrust Bank
as 20-1796
Defendant / Appellee:
SUNTRUST BANK, TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION, DONNA WILSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMMANUEL EDOKOBI
Emmanuel Edokobi v. Paul Grimm
as 20-1271
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE PAUL W. GRIMM
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMMANUEL EDOKOBI
Emmanuel Edokobi v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp
as 20-1243
Defendant / Appellee:
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION and SUNTRUST BANK
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMMANUEL EDOKOBI
Emmanuel Edokobi v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp
as 19-2289
Defendant / Appellee:
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION and SUNTRUST BANK
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMMANUEL EDOKOBI
Emmanuel Edokobi v. U. S. General Services Admin
as 19-2232
Defendant / Appellee:
NACIEVE OWENS, In HIs Personal and Official Capacities, MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES, DONNIE BAXTER and others
Defendant:
RUSHERN BAKER, III, In His Personal Capacities, JAMES DAILEY, DEPARTMENT OF PERMITTING, INSPECTIONS AND ENFORCEMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMMANUEL EDOKOBI
Edokobi v. SunTrust Bank et al
as 8:2019cv01071
Defendant:
Donna Wilson, Christine Montecalvo, Andrew B. Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Edokobi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Emmanuel Edokobi v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp
as 19-1203
Defendant / Appellee:
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION and SUNTRUST BANK
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMMANUEL EDOKOBI
Edokobi v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation et al
as 8:2019cv00248
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Credit Corporation and SunTrust Bank
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Edokobi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Edokobi v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 8:2017cv03639
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Edokobi
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Jeff Sessions, Rod Rosenstein and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-1760
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.