Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Carter v. The Lemelson Group, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Carter
Defendant:
The Lemelson Group, LLC and Emmanuel Lemelson
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
SEC v. Lemelson, et al
as 22-1630
Plaintiff / Appellee:
US SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellant:
GREGORY M. LEMELSON, LEMELSON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC and GREGORY M. LEMELSON, a/k/a Father Emmanuel Lemelson
Defendant:
THE AMVONA FUND, LP
Interested Party:
LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and VIKING THERAPEUTICS, INC.
Lemelson, et al v. Bloomberg L.P., et al
as 17-1620
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMMANUEL LEMELSON and LEMELSON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
BLOOMBERG L.P., MATTHEW ROBINSON, as an individual and as an agent of Bloomberg LP and JESSE WESTBROOK, as an individual and as an agent of Bloomberg LP
Lemelson et al v. Bloomberg L.P. et al
as 4:2016cv11650
Defendant:
Bloomberg L.P. , Matthew Robinson and Jesse Westbrook
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Lemelson and Lemelson Capital Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lemelson v. Lemelson
as 15-2320
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REV. FR. EMMANUEL LEMELSON, a/k/a Gregory M. Lemelson
Defendant - Appellee:
JASON D. LEMELSON
Lemelson v. Lemelson et al
as 4:2015cv40082
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Lemelson
Defendant:
Jason D Lemelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lemelson
as 4:2015cv40081
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Lemelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Lemelson, et al v. U.S. Bank National Association
as 12-2275
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMMANUEL LEMELSON, f/k/a Gregory M. Lemelson and ANJESA LEMELSON
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, TRUSTEE
Lemelson et al v. U.S. Bank National Association, Trustee
as 1:2012cv10677
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Lemelson and Anjeza Lemelson
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association, Trustee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
