Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Adamu v. Thomas et al
as 1:2025cv06508
Plaintiff:
Shareif Naheem Adamu
Defendant:
Officer Chassidy Thomas, Officer James Baker, Officer James Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peek et al v. Superior Court of Athens-Clark County et al
as 1:2025cv06157
Plaintiff:
Lauren Ashley Peek and Kathy Nixon
Defendant:
Superior Court of Athens-Clark County, Health and Human Services of the United States, Administrative Office of the Courts and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Bashir v. Childrens Hospital et al
as 1:2024cv05102
Defendant:
Childrens Hospital, Emory Hospital and Grady Hospital
Plaintiff:
Umar Bashir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Starks v. Dawson et al
as 3:2022cv00130
Plaintiff:
William L. Starks
Defendant:
James Dawson, Louis Deckmar, Lundy Maybrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Starks v. Dawson et al
as 3:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
William L. Starks
Defendant:
James Dawson, Louis Deckmar, Lundy Maybrey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Starks v. Dawson et al
as 1:2021cv04396
Plaintiff:
William L. Starks
Defendant:
James Dawson, Louis Deckmar, Lundy Mayberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howe v. Emory Hospital
as 1:2020cv00810
Plaintiff:
Sheila Howe
Defendant:
Emory Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Arthur v. Emory Hospital
as 1:2020cv00646
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Arthur
Defendant:
Emory Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howe v. Emory Hospital
as 1:2019cv05760
Plaintiff:
Sheila Howe
Defendant:
Emory Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
