Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Gold Cross EMS, Inc. v. Panasonic Corporation of North America
as 1:2020cv00171
Defendant:
Panasonic Corporation of North America
Plaintiff:
Gold Cross EMS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Gold Cross EMS, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2017cv00169
Plaintiff:
Gold Cross EMS, Inc.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Metro Health EMS, Inc. et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA
as 1:2016cv04481
Plaintiff:
Metro Health EMS, Inc. and Michael P. Healey
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Counter_claimant:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Counter_defendant:
Michael P. Healey and Metro Health EMS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
BELL v. GENESIS EMS INC
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 7:2013cv00084
Plaintiff:
CHARESE BELL
Defendant:
GENESIS EMS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gold Cross EMS, Inc. v. The Children's Hospital of Alabama
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2013cv00081
Plaintiff:
Gold Cross EMS, Inc.
Defendant:
The Children's Hospital of Alabama
Counter_claimant:
The Children's Hospital of Alabama
Counter_defendant:
Gold Cross EMS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Merge Emed, Inc. v. Virtual Radiologic Corproation
as 1:2007cv01798
Plaintiff:
Merge eMed, Inc., Merge eMed, Inc. and Merge eMed, Inc.
Defendant:
Virtual Radiologic Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.