Cases 41 - 50 of 249
Steele v. Galipeau et al
as 1:2023cv00412
Plaintiff:
Dominique D Steele
Defendant:
John Galipeau, Jason English and Westville Correctional Subordanates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
English v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv14046
Plaintiff:
Dionne English
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
English v. AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc., et al
as 1:2023cv11333
Plaintiff:
Pamela English
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc.,, Avlon Industries, Inc., Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jerome Williams v. Brian English
as 23-2889
Applicant:
JEROME WILLIAMS
Respondent:
BRIAN ENGLISH, Warden
English v. Loreal USA, Inc et al
as 1:2023cv09531
Plaintiff:
Vanessa English
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc, LOREAL USA Products, Inc., Soft Sheen Carson, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dakevee Wiggins v. Brian English
as 23-2775
Applicant:
DAKEVEE WIGGINS
Respondent:
BRIAN ENGLISH, Warden
Scruggs v. Moody et al
as 3:2023cv00692
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Scruggs
Defendant:
Moody, English, Rekitzke and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pello v. Wexford Medical et al
as 3:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
James Michael Pello, James M Pello and James Pello
Defendant:
Wexford Medical, Centurion Medical, Kuenzli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spiegel v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2023cv00527
Plaintiff:
James N Spiegel
Defendant:
John Galipeau and Jason English
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forris v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2023cv00518
Plaintiff:
Kijuan Forris
Defendant:
John Galipeau and Jason English
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
