Cases 1 - 10 of 658
Smith v. City of North Branch, Minnesota
as 0:2024cv01868
Plaintiff:
Eric Smith
Defendant:
City of North Branch, Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01651
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Messina v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01544
Plaintiff:
Eric Messina
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01500
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00960
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lindquist v. Taylor et al
as 0:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
Russell Floyd Lindquist
Defendant:
Vicki Taylor, Keith Ellison, Matt Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kempen v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Eric Kempen
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv03731
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Marohn v. Minnesota Board of Architecture, Engineering, Land Surveying, Landscape Architecture, Geoscience, and Interior Design, The et al
as 0:2023cv03717
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Marohn, Jr.
Defendant:
Minnesota Board of Architecture, Engineering, Land Surveying, Landscape Architecture, Geoscience, and Interior Design, The, Melisa Rodriguez, Daniel Kelsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gatlin v. Anoka County et al
as 0:2023cv03623
Plaintiff:
Douglas Gatlin
Defendant:
Anoka County, Scot Wilson, Eric Stafford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
