Civil Rights Cases filed in Indiana
HALL v. BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS, AND EXPLOSIVES et al
as 1:2015cv00500
Defendant: BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS, AND EXPLOSIVES, ERIC HOLDER, JR. and B. TODD JONES
Plaintiff: ANDREW H. HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Leslie v. Holder
as 4:2014cv00028
Plaintiff: Rick Leslie
Defendant: Eric Holder, Indiana State Police, Tippecanoe County Sheriffs Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SRIVASTAVA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv01383
Defendant: BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, GERALD BEPKO, JAY BRAY and others
Plaintiff: CAROLYN HERZ SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
GUTHRIE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv00234
Defendant: JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN, JR., MARTIN DEMPSEY, ERIC HOLDER and others
Plaintiff: PAUL A. GUTHRIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SRIVASTAVA v. BAYH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01295
Defendant: AFNI, INC., MARK BANNATYNE, JOHN BARTHOLOMEW and others
Plaintiff: CAROLYN HERZ SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
SRIVASTAVA v. PAYNE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00909
Defendant: KENDALE ADAMS, EVAN BAYH, GERALD BEPKO and others
Plaintiff: CAROLYN HERZ SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
MILLER v. KIELY et al
as 3:2011cv00013
Defendant: DEPUTY MATT F. KEPPLER, FBI AGENT BRIAN FLAHERTY, FORMER CONGRESSMAN BRAD ELLSWORTH and others
Plaintiff: JESHA DONALDSON MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
EGWUENU v. HOLDER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00370
Plaintiff: WILSON EGWUENU
Defendant: ERIC HOLDER and URBANA POLICE DEPT.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?