Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Moore et al v. Banas et al
as 1:2019cv05425
Defendant:
Joliet Township (Animal Control), Aristotelis Theodorou, Nikki Ormsby and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick T. Moore and Samantha Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2018cv07548
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PAYNE v. USA AUTO INSURANCE et al
as 1:2017cv01546
Plaintiff:
ERIC PAYNE
Defendant:
USAA AUTO INSURANCE, BANK ADMINISTRATION and CORPORATE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
PAYNE v. MEDSTAR SOUTHERN HOSPITAL CENTER
as 1:2017cv01383
Plaintiff:
ERIC PAYNE
Defendant:
MEDSTAR SOUTHERN HOSPITAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
PAYNE v. PAYNE
as 1:2017cv01384
Plaintiff:
ERIC PAYNE
Defendant:
HOWARD PAYNE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
PAYNE v. CROWN BARBERSHOP
as 1:2017cv01245
Plaintiff:
ERIC PAYNE
Defendant:
CROWN BARBERSHOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PAYNE v. CITY OF MORNINGSIDE, MD
as 1:2017cv00964
Plaintiff:
ERIC PAYNE
Defendant:
CITY OF MORNINGSIDE, MD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PAYNE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2017mc01074
Plaintiff:
ERIC PAYNE
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DC SUPERIOR COURT and METROPOLITAN POLICE HEADQUARTERS OF CHIEF
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
PAYNE v. PROUD MARY'S OWNERS et al
as 1:2017mc00958
Plaintiff:
ERIC PAYNE
Defendant:
PROUD MARY'S OWNERS, KASS, MITEK & KASS, PLLC, HOWARD PAYNE, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
PAYNE v. PENTAGON FEDERAL CREDIT UNION et al
as 1:2017mc00959
Plaintiff:
ERIC PAYNE
Defendant:
PENTAGON FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, MEDSTAR SOUTHERN MARYLAND HOSPITAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
