Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Soto v. Barner et al
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Darius Jason Soto
Defendant:
Reginald Barner, Morgan Stephenson, Eric Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cochran v. Wood et al
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Nathan Thomas Cochran
Defendant:
Sheriff Lenn Wood, Major Eric Smith, Sgt Josh Joyner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Cropper v. Palmer et al
as 3:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
Andrew David Cropper
Defendant:
Judge Emory Palmer, Herb Cranford, Jr., Azi Golshan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Wood et al
as 3:2021cv00052
Defendant:
Sheriff Lenn Wood, Major Campbell, C.O. R Barner and others
Plaintiff:
Dwone C Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harrison v. Wood et al
as 3:2021cv00039
Plaintiff:
Dwone Harrison
Defendant:
Lenn Wood, Lt. Stephens, Major Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wilhoite v. Smith et al
as 1:2019cv04511
Defendant:
Rachel Nicole McGee, Tyson Foods, Inc.,, Misty Dawn Harkins and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua D. Wilhoite
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nicholson v. Harrel et al
as 4:2018cv00225
Defendant:
Detective Banks, Savannah Chatham Metro P.D., Rebekah Gregory and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Nicholson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Burrows v. Yeager et al
as 3:2017cv00110
Defendant:
Corporal Anthony Cox, Sergeant Eric Smith, Detention Officer Fowler and others
Plaintiff:
William Maurice Burrows
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
