Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Cox v. Krpin, et al.
as 24-1224
Plaintiff: ERNEST LEE COX, JR.
Defendant: JOHN KRPIN, Doctor and MULE CREEK PRISON
(PC)Cox v. Bal et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00804
Plaintiff: Ernest Lee Cox, Jr.
Defendant: I. Bal, M. Williams and T. Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Samuel
as 22-764
Petitioner: ERNEST LEE COX, JR.
Respondent: DANNY SAMUEL, WARDEN
Dean v. Miller
as 2:2022cv00286
Petitioner: Ernest Lee Dean
Respondent: Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ernest Cox, Jr. v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 21-17131
Plaintiff / Appellant: ERNEST LEE COX, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee: SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary of CDCR, JOE A. LIZARRAGA, Warden, CAPTAIN L. OLIVAS and others
(PC) Vaden v. Heu et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv01066
Defendant: L. Morris, E. De La Cruz, Kahlon and others
Plaintiff: Ernest Lee Vaden, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ernest Dean v. Dravis, et al
as 21-35447
Defendant / Appellee: GULICK, CAIN, RUTHVEN and others
Defendant: SNAKE RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUION and OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff / Appellant: ERNEST LEE DEAN
(PC) Cox v. Daram We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv01295
Plaintiff: Ernest Lee Cox, Jr.
Defendant: Vasuki Daram, M. Williams, T. Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calkins et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2020cv01884
Plaintiff: Brian F. McMorris, Felix Jones, Nena Walby and others
Defendant: Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dean v. Dravis et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv02050
Defendant: Hemphill Koltes, Clements Digiulio, Gulick Smith and others
Plaintiff: Ernest Lee Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?