Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Brown v. Errington
as 1:2020cv00282
Plaintiff:
James Devon Brown
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Joe Errington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ferguson v. Errington et al
as 1:2020cv00266
Defendant:
Joe Errington and South Mississippi Correctional Institution
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
James Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Csaszak et al
as 1:2020cv00256
Defendant:
Jane Doe SMCI Administrative, Staff of Administrative SMCI, Unknown Pearce and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Lewis
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stratton v. Errington
as 1:2020cv00163
Petitioner:
Timothy W. Stratton
Respondent:
Joe Errington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crump v. Errington et al
as 1:2020cv00193
Defendant:
Joe Errington, Christy Guther, Burl Cain and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Crump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waddell et al v. Taylor et al
as 3:2020cv00340
Defendant:
Tommy Taylor, Joe Errington and Ron King
Plaintiff:
Erik Lewis, Roger Ewing, Bob Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randle v. Reed et al
as 1:2020cv00164
Plaintiff:
Monroe Randle
Defendant:
Joe Errington, Regina Reed and Katherine Blount
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Errington
as 1:2020cv00158
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Joe Errington
Plaintiff:
Glen Joseph Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Errington
as 1:2020cv00100
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Joseph Errington
Plaintiff:
Glen Joseph Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Magee v. Errington
as 3:2020cv00101
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Joshua Demien Magee
Respondent:
Superintendent Joe Errington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
