Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Smith v. WWE
as 23-11182
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Adrian Smith
Defendant / Appellee:
WWE, Incorporated, Carol Riddick, Frank Riddick and others
Nix v. Major League Baseball
as 23-20387
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Neiman Nix
Defendant / Appellee:
Major League Baseball, Office of the Commissioner of Baseball, Robert D. Manfred, Jr., Major League Baseball Players Association and others
Smith v. WWE Inc et al
as 3:2022cv01580
Plaintiff:
David Adrian Smith
Defendant:
WWE Inc, Carol Riddick, Frank Riddick and others
Nix v. Major League Baseball
as 22-20364
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Neiman Nix
Defendant / Appellee:
Major League Baseball, Office of the Commissioner of Baseball, Robert D. Manfred, Jr., Major League Baseball Players Association and others
Nimitz Technologies LLC v. ESPN Productions, Inc.
as 6:2021cv01384
Plaintiff:
Nimitz Technologies LLC
Defendant:
ESPN Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nix v. Major League Baseball, Office of the Commissioner of Baseball et al
as 4:2021cv04180
Plaintiff:
Neiman Nix
Defendant:
Major League Baseball, Office of the Commissioner of Baseball, Robert D. Manfred, Jr., Major League Baseball Players Association and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Platinum Jack Entertainment LLC v. ESPN Inc et al
as 3:2018cv00880
Plaintiff:
Platinum Jack Entertainment LLC
Defendant:
ESPN Inc and Chick-Fil-A Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
MyMail, Ltd. v. ESPN, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00200
Plaintiff:
MyMail, Ltd.
Defendant:
ESPN, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
38 Films, LLC et al v. Yamano et al
as 3:2016cv00198
Plaintiff:
38 Films, LLC and Charles E. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Wendy Yamano, Mt. Philo Films, LLC, ESPN, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bolmalek v. ESPN Productions, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00685
Plaintiff:
Malek Bolmalek
Defendant:
ESPN Productions, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
