Cases 1 - 10 of 33
CHEN v. GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK et al
as 2:2023cv02412
Plaintiff:
JOHN CHEN
Defendant:
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, EXECUTOR OF THE COUNTY OF NEWWARK, ESSEX COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHEN v. GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2023cv02109
Plaintiff:
JOHN CHEN
Defendant:
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY EXECUTOR, ESSEX COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KINCHEL v. CAULFIELD et al
as 2:2022cv05242
Plaintiff:
MAURICE ANTHONY KINCHEL
Defendant:
JUDGE REGINA CAUFIELD, WILLIAM A. DANIEL, LISA GREY-STACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARLEY v. ORTIZ et al
as 2:2022cv04385
Plaintiff:
JAMEEL HARLEY
Defendant:
DIRECTOR ORTIZ, WARDEN CIRILLO, NURSE ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
S. v. ESSEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2021cv08512
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, Essex County Corrections Officer Shawn D. Shaw, ESSEX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
E. S.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUHAMMAD v. WARDEN OF ESSEX COUNTY JAIL
as 2:2020cv15606
Petitioner:
KHALEE MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
WARDEN OF ESSEX COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LEGORE v. WARDEN, ESSEX COUNTY JAIL
as 2:2019cv21165
Petitioner:
TIO WESLEY LEGORE
Respondent:
WARDEN, ESSEX COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2019cv17591
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK, ESSEX COUNTY JAIL, SGT. ILIDIO FEREIRA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRYANT v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2019cv17592
Defendant:
P.O. JOANNA LOPEZ, JOHN DOE POLICE, SGT. RICHARD FLOUNOY, SR. and others
Plaintiff:
RAHEEM L BRYANT and RAHEEM BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv14544
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
