Cases 31 - 40 of 404
Killen et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2020cv00829
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Michael Killen and Mary Killen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Langston et al v. Ethicon Inc et al
as 3:2020cv03712
Plaintiff:
Marion Langston and Ray Langston
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baez v. Ethicon Inc et al
as 4:2020cv04259
Plaintiff:
Araceli Baez
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc, Johnson & Johnson, Gynecare Worldwide and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Labiche et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2020cv04249
Defendant:
Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Johnson & Johnson, Gynecare and others
Plaintiff:
Tammie Labiche and Mitchell Labiche
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wherry et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv01386
Plaintiff:
Carol L. Wherry and Jerome Wherry
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp., Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lim v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00780
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Deserie Lim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stebbins v. Ethicon Inc et al
as 2:2020cv01574
Plaintiff:
Nelda Christine Stebbins
Defendant:
Ethicon L L C, Ethicon Inc, Boston Scientific Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barone v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv03950
Defendant:
Ethicon, LLC, Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
August Barone and Deborah Barone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ashley et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00892
Plaintiff:
Reggenia Ashley and Michael Ashley
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramirez v. Ethicon LLC, et al
as 1:2020cv00467
Defendant:
Ethicon Incoporated, Ethicon, LLC, Johnson and Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Marina Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
