Cases 21 - 30 of 451
Stivers v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05000
Plaintiff:
Tom Stivers
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hemmerle v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05001
Plaintiff:
Frederick Hemmerle
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Davol, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crisp v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2021cv12314
Plaintiff:
Brenda Crisp
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Endo-Surgery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carlson et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04069
Plaintiff:
Renee Carlson and Gregory Carlson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C. R. Bard, Inc., Ethicon Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hubble et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2021cv00430
Plaintiff:
Winona G Hubbell, Theodore A Hubbell, Theodore Hubble and others
Defendant:
Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon Endo-Surgery, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morrill v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03804
Plaintiff:
Matthew Morrill
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stier et al v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03651
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon Inc, C.R. Bard Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Stier and Kaitlyn Stier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carlson et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00502
Plaintiff:
Gregory Carlson and Renee Carlson
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., C.R.Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor-Sterling v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2021cv00437
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Tina Taylor-Sterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rotstein v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02408
Plaintiff:
Michael Rotstein
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
