Cases 11 - 20 of 152
Hooper v. Ethicon, Inc. et al (JRG1)
as 1:2020cv00191
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon LLC
Plaintiff:
Linda F. Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thorne v. Ethicon, Inc. et al (JRG3)
as 3:2020cv00284
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon LLC
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Thorne and Mary Thorne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al (JRG2)
as 3:2020cv00282
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., C. R. Bard, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Emily Whitson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mayse et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al (JRG3)
as 2:2020cv00125
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Julie Mayse and Michael Mayse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Orr et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al (TV1)
as 2:2020cv00110
Defendant:
Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare, Johnson & Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Orr and Cindy Orr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02199
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
James Bell and Sue Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Emerick et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02065
Plaintiff:
Phillip Emerick and Glenda Emerick
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, American Medical Systems, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Long v. Ethicon, Inc. et al (TV2)
as 3:2020cv00042
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Janice Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Swavely v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02058
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Terri D. Swavely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wildfong et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00006
Plaintiff:
Harry Clayton Wildfong and Darlene Wildfong
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
