Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Sauray v. Arden Claims Service LLC
as 2:2024cv00645
Plaintiff:
Evan Sauray
Defendant:
Arden Claims Service LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Zappin v. Schorr
as 23-671
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Zappin
Defendant / Appellee:
Matthew F. Cooper, Kevin M. Doyle and David Evan Schorr
Defendant:
Michael Berg and Letitia A. James, Esq.
Bonde v. Wexler & Kaufman, PLLC et al
as 1:2023cv02877
Plaintiff:
Carl Ulfsson Bonde
Defendant:
Wexler & Kaufman, PLLC, Brett Wexler and Evan Teich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 m Diversity: Legal Malpractice
Barile v. Guimont
as 3:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Evan G Barile
Defendant:
Armand Guimont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05913
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00559
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Mazzio et al v. Sadler et al
as 1:2020cv00314
Defendant:
Jeffrey M Patty, Erik Wilkinson, Western Express Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mike's Heavy Duty Towing, Inc., Salvatore Mazzio and Michael Mazzio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Liou et al v. Nestle Dreyer's Ice Cream Company
as 1:2019cv05762
Plaintiff:
Charles Wiley, Jane Doe, Glenn Liou and others
Defendant:
Nestle Dreyer's Ice Cream Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr
Harris v. Mondelez Global LLC
as 1:2019cv02249
Defendant:
Mondelez Global LLC
Plaintiff:
Charles Harris, Jane Doe, Evan Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
