Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLOWERS v. EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY FLOWERS
Defendant:
EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, MIDTOWN HOSPITAL, TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2021cv00113
Plaintiff:
PETER DJUAN DONTRELL PARKER
Defendant:
EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, BERRY GLOBAL/BERRY PLASTICS, LAWMAN TACTICAL SECURITY & CONSULTING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHMITT v. DOE 1-6 et al
as 3:2021cv00051
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-2, AMY BRADY, KATRINA SANDERS and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH ROSS SCHMITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HORNE v. VANDERBURGH COUNTY et al
as 3:2020cv00042
Defendant:
CHELSEA MORRISON, VANDERBURGH COUNTY, EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
ANTOIN MARIO HORNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MINOR v. PIGMAN ET AL
as 3:2020cv00013
Defendant:
DEACONESS HOSPITAL, MARY B. WATSON, BARRY M. BLACKARD and others
Plaintiff:
LEONTE RAYSHAUN MINOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. WEDDING et al
as 3:2019cv00251
Defendant:
BILLY BOLIN, VANDERBURGH COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, LLOYD WINNECKE and others
Plaintiff:
OMOBEA K. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
