Cases 1 - 10 of 23
ZHANG v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2009cv00059
Plaintiff:
ZHIYOU ZHANG
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, JONATHAN SCHARFEN, EVELYN UPCHURCH and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02421
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
USMAN v. UPCHURCH et al
as 2:2008cv01443
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMED HARIS UMER USMAN
Defendant:
EVELYN UPCHURCH, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ZELAZO v. CHERTOFF et al
as 5:2008cv01183
Plaintiff:
MALGORZATA ZELAZO
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, EVELYN UPCHURCH and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SHEN et al v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv01014
Plaintiff:
QING SHEN, WEN FENG SUN and ZI XUAN SHEN
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, EVELYN UPCHURCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ADJEI et al v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2008cv00832
Plaintiff:
KWABENA ADJEI, MARY ADJEI, EUNICE ADJEI and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, JOHN E. THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LU v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv00097
Plaintiff:
GANWEI LU
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, EVELYN UPCHURCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
LU v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv00281
Plaintiff:
CANGHAI LU
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, EVELYN UPCHURCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv05258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
