Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Carlene Henry, et al v. Uber, et al
as 24-1547
Plaintiff:
CARLENE HENRY and EVERSON FRANCIS
Defendant:
UBER, DOUGLAS GREGG, PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv23289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HENRY et al v. UBER et al
as 2:2023cv22053
Plaintiff:
CARLENE HENRY and EVERSON FRANCIS
Defendant:
UBER, DOUGLAS GREGG, PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
FRANCIS et al v. SUMMIT MEDICAL GROUP FOUNDATION et al
as 2:2020cv01411
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, M.D HOWARD BLAUSTEIN, MD WILLIAM A TANSEY, III and others
Plaintiff:
EVERSON FRANCIS and E.F.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FRANCIS v. NASTASI et al
as 2:2020cv00994
Defendant:
CARISSA L. NASTASI, ENTERPRISE RENT A CAR, UNKNOWN TOW TRUCK DRIVER DOES 1 TO 10 and others
Plaintiff:
EVERSON FRANCIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Everson Francis v. Amanda Felder, et al
as 19-3186
Defendant:
SUN VALLEY PLAZA LLC, MIDDLESEX MANAGEMENT INC and MURRAY HALPERN
Defendant / Appellee:
LORENZA STEVENS, AMANDA FELDER, PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EVERSON FRANCIS
FRANCIS v. FELDER et al
as 2:2019cv18082
Defendant:
AMANDA FELDER, LORENZA STEVENS ET AL, PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE and others
Plaintiff:
EVERSON FRANCIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Everson Francis v. LexisNexis, et al
as 19-1688
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE, DASHEENE MATTHEWS, LEXISNEXIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EVERSON FRANCIS
FRANCIS v. HOMESITE INSURANCE et al
as 2:2019cv08234
Defendant:
Middlesex Managment, PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE, HOMESITE INSURANCE and others
Plaintiff:
EVERSON FRANCIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FRANCIS v. FELDER et al
as 2:2019cv07246
Defendant:
Amanda Felder, unknown Supervisor at homesite and Progressive/homesite insurance
Plaintiff:
EVERSON FRANCIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
