Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv02262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Miranda v. Exel, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01897
Plaintiff:
Donna Miranda
Defendant:
Exel, Inc. doing business as DHL Supply Chain (USA)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Young et al v. Exel, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01344
Plaintiff:
Michael Young and Donna Miranda
Defendant:
Exel, Inc. doing business as DHL Supply Chain
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01950
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kagey v. Exel, Inc.
as 5:2020cv00772
Defendant:
Exel, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Kagey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv02262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Franklin v. Ballard et al
as 3:2007cv00053
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Franklin and Michael R. Franklin
Defendant:
Carnell C. Ballard, Exel, Inc., Lynn W. Mango and others
Cross-Claimant:
Exel, Inc., Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P., Carnell C. Ballard and others
Cross Defendant:
Lynn W. Mango, Lynn W. Mango, CBS Transportation, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
