Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Ridley (ID 117475) v. Williams
as 5:2022cv03304
Petitioner:
Anthony Earl Ridley
Respondent:
Thomas L. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. O'Neil et al
as 5:2022cv03085
Plaintiff:
Willis Earl Jenkins, Jr.
Defendant:
Elizabeth O'Neil, (fnu) Ravencamp, El Paso County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Korgan et al v. Cramer
as 2:2021cv02567
Plaintiff:
Johnny Korgan and Susan Korgan
Defendant:
Estate of Earl E. Hansen, Deceased and Daniel W. Cramer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Korgan et al v. Hansen
as 2:2021cv02327
Plaintiff:
Johnny Korgan and Susan Korgan
Defendant:
Earl E Hansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ridley (ID 117475) v. State of Kansas et al
as 5:2021cv03158
Petitioner:
Anthony Earl Ridley
Respondent:
State of Kansas, Laura Kelly, Jeff Zmuda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Audubon of Kansas, Inc. v. United States Department of Interior, et al
as 2:2021cv02025
Defendant:
Michael Beam, United States Department of Interior, David Bernhardt and others
Plaintiff:
Audubon of Kansas, Inc.
Petitioner:
Big Bend Groundwater Management District No. 5
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Marshall v. English et al
as 5:2020cv03190
Defendant:
W. J. Morris, Earl Leroy Yeakel, III, Craig Watkins and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Marshall, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sirvira v. USA DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE - All Filings to be Made in Criminal Case 13-40115-04-JAR Only
as 5:2020cv04028
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Henry Earl Sirvira
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sirvira v. USA
as 5:2020cv04006
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Henry Earl Sirvira
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Goines v. Norris et al
as 6:2019cv01333
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Earl Goines, Sr.
Defendant:
Mike Norris and Sedgwick County Correctional
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
