Cases 1 - 10 of 107
Walton v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00174
Petitioner:
Tyrone Earl Walton
Respondent:
J. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Strack
as 2:2023cv01253
Plaintiff:
Earl Douglas Woods, Jr.
Defendant:
Rickie Strack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Multnomah County Sheriffs
as 3:2023cv00435
Plaintiff:
Timothy Earl Davis and Timmothy Earl Davis
Defendant:
Multnomah County Sheriffs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayo v. Cain
as 2:2023cv00003
Petitioner:
Robert Earl Mayo
Respondent:
Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01998
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Ard v Boyd et al
as 3:2022cv01421
Plaintiff:
Marlin Ard
Defendant:
Hilary D Boyd, Oregon State Bar, Oregon State Bar Disciplinary Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DeVore v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2022cv01407
Plaintiff:
Raymond Earl DeVore
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Department of Justice, Office of Information Policy and Matthew W. Hurd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alcalacarrillo et al v. Peters et al
as 3:2022cv00487
Plaintiff:
Oscar Fermin Alcalacarrillo, Adam Steven Anderson, Donald Lee Anderson and others
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Sue Washburn, Paula Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01361
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01157
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
