Cases 31 - 40 of 130
Kluss v. Naperville Police Dept.
as 1:2019cv07834
Plaintiff:
Early D. Kluss
Defendant:
Naperville Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Orr v. Carter et al
as 3:2019cv01067
Defendant:
Carter, Canzoneri, Smiley and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Orr
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Redd v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al
as 1:2019cv07346
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association and Southwestern Athletic Conference
Plaintiff:
Robert Early Redd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BERRY v. WEXFORD MEDICAL COMPANY et al
as 1:2019cv04166
Defendant:
WEXFORD MEDICAL COMPANY, DUSHAN ZATECKY and L. FRYE
Plaintiff:
EARLIE B.A. BERRY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. South Bend City of et al
as 3:2019cv00882
Defendant:
Philip Trent, Jeff Chambelain, Joseph Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
Zachary Steven Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REDD v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2019cv02814
Defendant:
SOUTHWESTERN ATHLETIC CONFERENCE, THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION and NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff:
ROBERT EARLY REDD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BERRY v. EVANS et al
as 1:2019cv01615
Defendant:
JOHN POER, CHAD EVANS and WENDY KNIGHT
Plaintiff:
EARLIE B.A. BERRY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERRY v. LITTLEJOHN et al
as 1:2019cv01616
Defendant:
F. LITTLEJOHN and K. HUNTER
Plaintiff:
EARLIE B.A. BERRY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERRY v. ZATECKY et al
as 1:2019cv01511
Defendant:
D. DAVIS, DUSHAN ZATECKY and BROOKS
Plaintiff:
EARLIE B.A. BERRY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERRY v. COMMISSIONER OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2019cv01476
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF INDIANA, DUSHAN ZATECKY, CHAD EVANS and others
Plaintiff:
EARLIE B.A. BERRY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
