Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Easley v. Smith
as 3:2015cv00150
Plaintiff:
Charles J. Easley
Defendant:
P. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Donnell v. Perry et al
as 3:2014cv00229
Plaintiff:
Ryan Nicholas O'Donnell, II
Defendant:
Gloria Perry, L. Easley and R. Abangan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayflower Restaurant of Asheboro (No.7), LLC et al v. BP, plc et al
as 1:2013cv00185
Plaintiff:
Mayflower Restaurant of Asheboro (No.7), LLC , Mayflower Restaurant of Burlington (No.10), LLC , Mayflower Restaurant of Concord (No.9), LLC and others
Defendant:
BP, plc, BP America, Inc., BP Company North America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Easley v. Globe Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 3:2011cv00719
Plaintiff:
Jessie Easley
Defendant:
Globe Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Easley v. Astrue
as 3:2010cv00123
Plaintiff:
Anthony Easley
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Easley v. Lowndes County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2010cv00263
Plaintiff:
John Douglas Easley
Defendant:
Lowndes County Adult Detention Center, Butch Howard, Billy Pickens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easley et al v. Bellsouth Advertising & Publishing Corporation
as 1:2010cv00099
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Easley, Jr. and Easley Law Firms, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Bellsouth Advertising & Publishing Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Easley v. King et al
as 3:2009cv00132
Petitioner:
Darrell Dewayne Easley
Respondent:
Ron King and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Easley v. King et al
as 2:2009cv00229
Petitioner:
Darrell Dewayne Easley
Defendant:
Ron King and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
