Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Easley et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv00835
Plaintiff:
DeMarco Easley and Mohammed Abu Wali
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas and Kevin Riddle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Easley v. Waters et al
as 3:2023cv03062
Plaintiff:
William Easley
Defendant:
Waters, Ryan Hughes and D. Galloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easley v. AFAM Concept, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06213
Plaintiff:
Arma Easley
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc., Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, House of Cheatham LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Easley v. Garrett et al
as 3:2023cv02112
Plaintiff:
William Easley
Defendant:
Joseph C Garrett, Karl R Bradford and Darren D Galloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easley v. Bracken et al
as 3:2023cv02113
Plaintiff:
William Easley
Defendant:
Bracken and Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Primerica Life Insurance Company v. McKissic-Brown et al
as 1:2021cv04914
Plaintiff:
PRIMERICA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
BRITTANY MCKISSIC-BROWN, ROBYNNE COOPER, AVERY EASLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MacKintosh v. Aramark, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv04095
Defendant:
Ashley McCoy, Verla Simmons, Nicole Atwater and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis J MacKintosh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easley v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al
as 1:2019cv00436
Plaintiff:
Gary Easley
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association and The Missouri Valley Conference
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv09014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv08233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
