Cases 1 - 10 of 29
EASLEY-EL v. WARGNY et al
as 1:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
LERON EVERETT EASLEY-EL
Defendant:
CHLOE WARGNY and JOHN MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EASLEY-EL v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2019cv03138
Defendant:
LAURA BODKIN, V. SHEPHERD, MICHELLE LAFLOWER and others
Plaintiff:
LERON EVERETT EASLEY-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EASLEY v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2018cv03662
Plaintiff:
GARY EASLEY
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, MISSOURI VALLEY CONFERENCE and THE MISSOURI VALLEY CONFERENCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EASLEY v. BROWN
as 2:2018cv00162
Respondent:
RICHARD BROWN
Petitioner:
RAYMOND EASLEY
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
EASLEY v. CLARK COUNTY et al
as 4:2017cv00233
Defendant:
SAM BEARD, B. BOWER, CLARK COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HENRY EASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2017cv04510
Defendant:
DAWN EASLEY, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and LAURIE JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
DENA JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EASLEY v. NOEL et al
as 4:2017cv00206
Defendant:
SAM BEARD, BOLEY, BOWER and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. EASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EASLEY v. SNELLING et al
as 4:2017cv00188
Defendant:
BEARD, GILTNER, LIMBACH and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HENRY EASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EASLEY v. MOSS
as 4:2017cv00158
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HENRY EASLEY
Defendant:
S. MOSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EASLEY v. KNIGHT
as 1:2017cv02832
Petitioner:
RAYMOND EASLEY
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
