Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Neal v. East Haven et al
as 3:2015cv01628
Plaintiff:
David Shaun Neal
Defendant:
Town of East Haven, East Haven Police Dept and East Haven BD of Police Comm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Emma Jones v. East Haven
as 10-4894
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Emma Jones, Administratrix of the Estate of Malik Jones and as guardian Ad Litem of Priya Jones
Defendant:
James Criscuolo, I/O, Chief of Police of East Haven and City of New Haven
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Town of East Haven, East Haven Police Dept., Robert Flodquist, I/O, East Haven Police Officer and others
Emma Jones v. East Haven
as 10-4731
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Emma Jones, Administratrix of the Estate of Malik Jones and as guardian Ad Litem of Priya Jones
Defendant:
James Criscuolo, I/O, Chief of Police of East Haven and City of New Haven
Defendant - Appellant:
Town of East Haven, East Haven Police Dept., Robert Flodquist, I/O, East Haven Police Officer and others
Chacon et al v. East Haven Police Dept et al
as 3:2010cv01692
Plaintiff:
Marcia Chacon , Wilfrido Matute , James Manship and others
Defendant:
East Haven Police Dept, Town of East Haven, Leonard Gallo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rowe v. East Haven Police Dept et al
as 3:2008cv01693
Plaintiff:
Donald Raymond Rowe
Defendant:
East Haven Police Dept and John Doe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rowe v. East Haven Police Dept et al
as 3:2008mc00374
Plaintiff:
Donald Raymond Rowe
Defendant:
East Haven Police Dept and John Doe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
