Cases 41 - 50 of 107
EASTERLING IV v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv91080
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LEWIS EASTERLING IV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EASTERLING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv80067
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN KYLE EASTERLING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EASTERLING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv53246
Plaintiff:
KEVIN EASTERLING
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EASTERLING v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv01012
Plaintiff:
KEVIN EASTERLING
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Easterling, Jr. et al v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00303
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production Inc and BP America Production Company
Plaintiff:
Fred Easterling, Jr.
Dean v. Easterling et al
as 3:2019cv00566
Defendant:
Mr. Charles Easterling, Advance Local Media LLC, Charles Easterling and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Nicholas Dean and Nicholas Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEAN v. EASTERLING et al
as 3:2019cv00526
Defendant:
CHARLES EASTERLING and ADVANCE LOCAL MEDIA LLC
Plaintiff:
MR. NICHOLAS DEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jerry Easterling v. Ford Motor Company
as 18-12914
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY W. EASTERLING
Defendant - Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Jerry Easterling v. Ford Motor Company
as 18-12914
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY W. EASTERLING
Defendant / Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Jarrell v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00602
Plaintiff:
Marquise Jarrell
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Easterling Correctional Facility, Walter Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
