Cases 81 - 90 of 140
Noland v. Easterling et al
as 3:2010mc00020
Plaintiff:
Duane E. Noland
Defendant:
Joe Easterling, Jack Carter and Deanne Mills
Tackett v. Easterling et al
as 1:2010cv01035
Petitioner:
Troy Tackett
Respondent:
Joe Easterling and State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Easterling et al
as 1:2010cv01030
Petitioner:
Kelvin Anthony Lee
Respondent:
Joseph Easterling, Robert E. Cooper, Jr. and Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Corrections Corporation of America, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01029
Plaintiff:
Steven Anderson
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Inc., George Little, Commissioner of Tennessee Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kotewa v. Easterling
as 3:2010cv00006
Petitioner:
Thomas Edward Kotewa
Respondent:
Joseph Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tharpe v. Easterling
as 1:2009cv01283
Petitioner:
Andre Randolph Tharpe
Respondent:
Joe Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kotewa v. Easterling
as 1:2009cv01278
Petitioner:
Thomas Edward Kotewa
Respondent:
Joseph Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smotherman v. Beene et al
as 3:2009cv01162
Plaintiff:
Patrick E. Smotherman
Defendant:
Merrill Beene, Gary Flangan, Rusty N. Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baxter v. Easterling
as 1:2009cv00310
Petitioner:
Johnny Baxter
Respondent:
Joe Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Easterling
as 1:2009cv00085
Petitioner:
William J. Johnson
Respondent:
Joe Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
